header-logo header-logo

19 November 2009
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tribunals must account for stigma

Court of Appeal rules financial loss should include stigma from bringing discrimination claim

Employment tribunals should take into account the stigma of bringing a discrimination claim when assessing financial loss, the Court of Appeal has held.

In Chaggers v Abbey National, the employment tribunal upheld Abbey National employee Balbinder Chaggers’ claim that his selection for redundancy was motivated by race. He was awarded £2.79m on the premise he would never again be able to find employment in his chosen field of the financial services industry.

Abbey contended that Chaggers would have been made redundant anyway, and that they should not be held responsible for the stigma attached to legal claims by others.

Chaggers countered that he should be compensated for the full loss of the discrimination. He claimed he was discriminated against by potential employers because of the stigma of bringing a claim, the length of time he was unemployed, the issue surrounding his departure and the fact he was applying for jobs that would normally be filled internally.

In an important ruling on the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll