header-logo header-logo

19 November 2009
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tribunals must account for stigma

Court of Appeal rules financial loss should include stigma from bringing discrimination claim

Employment tribunals should take into account the stigma of bringing a discrimination claim when assessing financial loss, the Court of Appeal has held.

In Chaggers v Abbey National, the employment tribunal upheld Abbey National employee Balbinder Chaggers’ claim that his selection for redundancy was motivated by race. He was awarded £2.79m on the premise he would never again be able to find employment in his chosen field of the financial services industry.

Abbey contended that Chaggers would have been made redundant anyway, and that they should not be held responsible for the stigma attached to legal claims by others.

Chaggers countered that he should be compensated for the full loss of the discrimination. He claimed he was discriminated against by potential employers because of the stigma of bringing a claim, the length of time he was unemployed, the issue surrounding his departure and the fact he was applying for jobs that would normally be filled internally.

In an important ruling on the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll