header-logo header-logo

Tribunals must account for stigma

19 November 2009
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Court of Appeal rules financial loss should include stigma from bringing discrimination claim

Employment tribunals should take into account the stigma of bringing a discrimination claim when assessing financial loss, the Court of Appeal has held.

In Chaggers v Abbey National, the employment tribunal upheld Abbey National employee Balbinder Chaggers’ claim that his selection for redundancy was motivated by race. He was awarded £2.79m on the premise he would never again be able to find employment in his chosen field of the financial services industry.

Abbey contended that Chaggers would have been made redundant anyway, and that they should not be held responsible for the stigma attached to legal claims by others.

Chaggers countered that he should be compensated for the full loss of the discrimination. He claimed he was discriminated against by potential employers because of the stigma of bringing a claim, the length of time he was unemployed, the issue surrounding his departure and the fact he was applying for jobs that would normally be filled internally.

In an important ruling on the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll