header-logo header-logo

A trouble shared

06 March 2008 / Charles Brasted
Issue: 7311 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Legal services
printer mail-detail

A proposed extension of the application of FIA 2000 raises questions both of principle and practice, says Charles Brasted

The latest consultation on the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000), Freedom of Information Act 2000: Designation of Additional Public Authorities (CP 27/07), which closed on 1 February 2008, has outlined controversial government proposals to extend its scope beyond the public authorities currently subject to its provisions.

FIA 2000 came fully into force on 1 January 2005 and gives anyone, including foreign nationals and companies, access to any information held by public authorities, subject to some statutory exemptions.

 

CORE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES

Bodies currently subject to FIA 2000, s 4 fall into one of two categories:

Public authorities—people or organisations whose establishment or appointment is (broadly speaking) made by or on behalf of the Crown or by legislation— listed in Sch 1 to FIA 2000 (which may be amended by order).

Companies wholly owned by a public authority.

 

Section 5

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll