header-logo header-logo

A trouble shared

06 March 2008 / Charles Brasted
Issue: 7311 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Legal services
printer mail-detail

A proposed extension of the application of FIA 2000 raises questions both of principle and practice, says Charles Brasted

The latest consultation on the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000), Freedom of Information Act 2000: Designation of Additional Public Authorities (CP 27/07), which closed on 1 February 2008, has outlined controversial government proposals to extend its scope beyond the public authorities currently subject to its provisions.

FIA 2000 came fully into force on 1 January 2005 and gives anyone, including foreign nationals and companies, access to any information held by public authorities, subject to some statutory exemptions.

 

CORE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES

Bodies currently subject to FIA 2000, s 4 fall into one of two categories:

Public authorities—people or organisations whose establishment or appointment is (broadly speaking) made by or on behalf of the Crown or by legislation— listed in Sch 1 to FIA 2000 (which may be amended by order).

Companies wholly owned by a public authority.

 

Section 5 provides for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll