header-logo header-logo

06 March 2008 / Charles Brasted
Issue: 7311 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Legal services
printer mail-detail

A trouble shared

A proposed extension of the application of FIA 2000 raises questions both of principle and practice, says Charles Brasted

The latest consultation on the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000), Freedom of Information Act 2000: Designation of Additional Public Authorities (CP 27/07), which closed on 1 February 2008, has outlined controversial government proposals to extend its scope beyond the public authorities currently subject to its provisions.

FIA 2000 came fully into force on 1 January 2005 and gives anyone, including foreign nationals and companies, access to any information held by public authorities, subject to some statutory exemptions.

 

CORE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES

Bodies currently subject to FIA 2000, s 4 fall into one of two categories:

Public authorities—people or organisations whose establishment or appointment is (broadly speaking) made by or on behalf of the Crown or by legislation— listed in Sch 1 to FIA 2000 (which may be amended by order).

Companies wholly owned by a public authority.

 

Section 5 provides for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll