header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 October 2021 / Edward Peters KC , Julia Petrenko
Issue: 7950 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Troubled waters? The classification of items on land

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
59351
Edward Peters & Julia Petrenko discuss a legal tussle over a boathouse which serves as a useful reminder of the classification of items on land
  • Covers Royal Parks Ltd v Bluebird Boat, a recent case about ownership of the Boathouse on the Serpentine in Hyde Park.

Property practitioners will no doubt be familiar with the classification of objects brought onto land as falling within one of three categories: chattel; fixture; or part and parcel of the land. Many practitioners may also be familiar with the Serpentine Lake in Hyde Park, where visitors can hire a pedalo or rowing boat. Royal Parks Ltd v Bluebird Boat [2021] EWHC 2278 (TCC), [2021] All ER (D) 38 (Aug) concerned a dispute as to the ownership of the boathouse and jetties (‘the Boathouse’) on the Serpentine. Following an expedited trial, O’Farrell J held, by reason of the extent of annexation of the building to the land, and the purpose of its design and construction as a permanent enhancement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll