header-logo header-logo

01 October 2021 / Edward Peters KC , Julia Petrenko
Issue: 7950 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Troubled waters? The classification of items on land

59351
Edward Peters & Julia Petrenko discuss a legal tussle over a boathouse which serves as a useful reminder of the classification of items on land
  • Covers Royal Parks Ltd v Bluebird Boat, a recent case about ownership of the Boathouse on the Serpentine in Hyde Park.

Property practitioners will no doubt be familiar with the classification of objects brought onto land as falling within one of three categories: chattel; fixture; or part and parcel of the land. Many practitioners may also be familiar with the Serpentine Lake in Hyde Park, where visitors can hire a pedalo or rowing boat. Royal Parks Ltd v Bluebird Boat [2021] EWHC 2278 (TCC), [2021] All ER (D) 38 (Aug) concerned a dispute as to the ownership of the boathouse and jetties (‘the Boathouse’) on the Serpentine. Following an expedited trial, O’Farrell J held, by reason of the extent of annexation of the building to the land, and the purpose of its design and construction as a permanent enhancement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll