header-logo header-logo

14 November 2016
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Trump & the Supreme Court

President-elect Trump is likely to have an opportunity to fill four vacancies in the US Supreme Court during his term in office.

And, unlike President Obama, he can expect to find his nominees endorsed by a Senate controlled by his own Republican party, Geoffrey Bindman QC writes in this week’s NLJ. Once appointed, Supreme Court justices are there for life or until voluntary retirement.

Following the death of Antonin Scalia, a conservative, in February, President Obama nominated Judge Merrick Garland, a moderate liberal. However, the Senate deferred the confirmation process pending the election, therefore it will be Trump who makes the decision. A further three justices are aged 83, 80 and 78.

Currently the justices are balanced between the liberal and conservative camps therefore a Trump appointment will tilt the court towards the conservative side. Bindman points out that until one of the elderly liberal judges is replaced, the court is likely to retain its liberal stance on social issues.

However, Bindman says the 1972 Roe v Wade ruling that an absolute prohibition of abortion by any state is unconstitutional is “unlikely to survive a Trump presidency”.

Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Sally Ann Masih, Suzy Overton & Jane Beaumont

Switalskis—Sally Ann Masih, Suzy Overton & Jane Beaumont

Trio of recruits strengthens Switalskis residential property team

Ward Hadaway—Steven Hayward

Ward Hadaway—Steven Hayward

Birmingham law firm appoints construction partner

Flint Bishop—six appointments

Flint Bishop—six appointments

Flint Bishop accelerates Northern growth through strategic senior appointments

NEWS
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
Jonathan Fisher KC’s wide-ranging fraud report contains worthwhile proposals, but turning them into workable reform will require money, capacity and political will
back-to-top-scroll