header-logo header-logo

13 December 2007 / Michael Furness , Emily Mckechnie
Issue: 7301 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Trust to the future

Michael Furness QC and Emily McKechnie examine how the new money laundering and trusts regime will affect those offering advice and services to trustees

Many professional and business activities will be affected by the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/2157) (the regulations), which come into force on 15 December 2007. One area which has caused particular difficulty in drafting the regulations is that of advice and other professional services provided to trusts and trustees.

The regulations implement the Money Laundering Directive 2005/60/EC. The “relevant persons” they apply to include credit and financial institutions, auditors, accountants, tax advisers and insolvency practitioners, independent legal professionals, trust or company service providers, estate agents and high value dealers. Most of these might do business with trustees.

BENEFICIAL OWNER

The regulations introduce customer due diligence (CDD) procedures, obliging the relevant person to identify his customer and the “beneficial owner”, where the customer is different. The customer must be not only identified, but his identity verified by documents, data or information from a reliable and independent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll