header-logo header-logo

04 December 2008 / Joe Mcmanus
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Features , Damages
printer mail-detail

Turning the tables?

Ogden 6—are they making a difference in assessing PI claims? asks Joe McManus

The Ogden Tables are designed to assist in the more accurate calculation of future loss in personal injury claims. The sixth edition of the Ogden Tables (Ogden 6) published in May 2008 introduces some signifi cant changes, particularly as regards the calculation of contingencies other than mortality.

Ogden 6 confirms that we are all living a little longer; however, it is in respect of the changes for residual loss of earnings that the biggest change has taken place.

Under the old tables, the determining factors in calculating the discount to apply to multipliers were: occupation; economic activity; and geographical locations. These have been replaced and Ogden 6 discounts are now based on educational achievement, employment status and whether or not someone is disabled. (Table B in the sixth edition sets out the discounts which apply to disabled people up to the age of 54).

Ogden 6 confirms that we are all living a little longer; however, it is in respect of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll