header-logo header-logo

04 December 2008 / Joe Mcmanus
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Features , Damages
printer mail-detail

Turning the tables?

Ogden 6—are they making a difference in assessing PI claims? asks Joe McManus

The Ogden Tables are designed to assist in the more accurate calculation of future loss in personal injury claims. The sixth edition of the Ogden Tables (Ogden 6) published in May 2008 introduces some signifi cant changes, particularly as regards the calculation of contingencies other than mortality.

Ogden 6 confirms that we are all living a little longer; however, it is in respect of the changes for residual loss of earnings that the biggest change has taken place.

Under the old tables, the determining factors in calculating the discount to apply to multipliers were: occupation; economic activity; and geographical locations. These have been replaced and Ogden 6 discounts are now based on educational achievement, employment status and whether or not someone is disabled. (Table B in the sixth edition sets out the discounts which apply to disabled people up to the age of 54).

Ogden 6 confirms that we are all living a little longer; however, it is in respect of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Sheffield expansion continues with appointment of commercial property partner

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson strengthens banking and finance practice with latest partner appointment Paul Duggan

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Employment partner joins Ward Hadaway

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll