header-logo header-logo

04 December 2008 / Joe Mcmanus
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Features , Damages
printer mail-detail

Turning the tables?

Ogden 6—are they making a difference in assessing PI claims? asks Joe McManus

The Ogden Tables are designed to assist in the more accurate calculation of future loss in personal injury claims. The sixth edition of the Ogden Tables (Ogden 6) published in May 2008 introduces some signifi cant changes, particularly as regards the calculation of contingencies other than mortality.

Ogden 6 confirms that we are all living a little longer; however, it is in respect of the changes for residual loss of earnings that the biggest change has taken place.

Under the old tables, the determining factors in calculating the discount to apply to multipliers were: occupation; economic activity; and geographical locations. These have been replaced and Ogden 6 discounts are now based on educational achievement, employment status and whether or not someone is disabled. (Table B in the sixth edition sets out the discounts which apply to disabled people up to the age of 54).

Ogden 6 confirms that we are all living a little longer; however, it is in respect of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll