header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tweeting tamed?

Only accredited members of the press will be able to tweet from court, under new proposals from Lord Judge CJ.

The consultation, published this week, follows interim guidance issued in December that judges could accept applications from any individual as long as there was no danger of interference with the administration of justice.

Under the new proposals, instant text-based messages via Twitter, e-mail or mobile phone by accredited members of the media will be allowed during court hearings. The presumption behind this is that “the media will be familiar with the requirements of fair and accurate reporting, that they will abide by the relevant Press Complaints Commission codes of practice, and that they will understand and abide by any reporting restrictions that may be imposed”.

The judge in each case will have discretion as to what is allowed and could extend the privilege to non-accredited members of the media if deemed appropriate.

In the Supreme Court, however, a different code applies. Its president, Lord Phillips, has said legal teams and members of the public as well as journalists can tweet from the highest court in the land because there is “seldom” any need for confidentiality once a case has reached that stage.
 

Issue: 7452 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll