header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tweeting tamed?

Only accredited members of the press will be able to tweet from court, under new proposals from Lord Judge CJ.

The consultation, published this week, follows interim guidance issued in December that judges could accept applications from any individual as long as there was no danger of interference with the administration of justice.

Under the new proposals, instant text-based messages via Twitter, e-mail or mobile phone by accredited members of the media will be allowed during court hearings. The presumption behind this is that “the media will be familiar with the requirements of fair and accurate reporting, that they will abide by the relevant Press Complaints Commission codes of practice, and that they will understand and abide by any reporting restrictions that may be imposed”.

The judge in each case will have discretion as to what is allowed and could extend the privilege to non-accredited members of the media if deemed appropriate.

In the Supreme Court, however, a different code applies. Its president, Lord Phillips, has said legal teams and members of the public as well as journalists can tweet from the highest court in the land because there is “seldom” any need for confidentiality once a case has reached that stage.
 

Issue: 7452 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll