header-logo header-logo

Two cheers for SLAPP legislation

23 May 2025 / Michael Bundock
Issue: 8117 / Categories: Features , Dispute resolution , CPR , Procedure & practice , Fraud
printer mail-detail
219530
Michael Bundock gives a muted welcome to the new rules
  • Anti-SLAPP legislation is at last on the statute book, although not yet in force. A defendant will be able to have a SLAPP claim struck out.
  • However, as this article explains, only limited forms of SLAPP are affected.

Journalists, publishers and lawyers have long been concerned that the courts can be used to stifle legitimate comment or criticism, a practice often referred to as strategic litigation against public participation (SLAPP). However, it is not always easy to distinguish between abusive behaviour and the ordinary stresses and strains of litigation, and introducing legislation has proved to be a slow process. In July 2022, the then government announced that it had fired ‘the opening salvo’ against SLAPP. Almost three years later, legislation has made its way on to the statute book, but it has yet to come into force and, even when it does, it is likely to disappoint campaigners.

SLAPP has been defined in various ways, but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll