header-logo header-logo

23 May 2025 / Michael Bundock
Issue: 8117 / Categories: Features , Dispute resolution , CPR , Procedure & practice , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Two cheers for SLAPP legislation

219530
Michael Bundock gives a muted welcome to the new rules
  • Anti-SLAPP legislation is at last on the statute book, although not yet in force. A defendant will be able to have a SLAPP claim struck out.
  • However, as this article explains, only limited forms of SLAPP are affected.

Journalists, publishers and lawyers have long been concerned that the courts can be used to stifle legitimate comment or criticism, a practice often referred to as strategic litigation against public participation (SLAPP). However, it is not always easy to distinguish between abusive behaviour and the ordinary stresses and strains of litigation, and introducing legislation has proved to be a slow process. In July 2022, the then government announced that it had fired ‘the opening salvo’ against SLAPP. Almost three years later, legislation has made its way on to the statute book, but it has yet to come into force and, even when it does, it is likely to disappoint campaigners.

SLAPP has been defined in various ways,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll