header-logo header-logo

23 May 2025 / Michael Bundock
Issue: 8117 / Categories: Features , Dispute resolution , CPR , Procedure & practice , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Two cheers for SLAPP legislation

219530
Michael Bundock gives a muted welcome to the new rules
  • Anti-SLAPP legislation is at last on the statute book, although not yet in force. A defendant will be able to have a SLAPP claim struck out.
  • However, as this article explains, only limited forms of SLAPP are affected.

Journalists, publishers and lawyers have long been concerned that the courts can be used to stifle legitimate comment or criticism, a practice often referred to as strategic litigation against public participation (SLAPP). However, it is not always easy to distinguish between abusive behaviour and the ordinary stresses and strains of litigation, and introducing legislation has proved to be a slow process. In July 2022, the then government announced that it had fired ‘the opening salvo’ against SLAPP. Almost three years later, legislation has made its way on to the statute book, but it has yet to come into force and, even when it does, it is likely to disappoint campaigners.

SLAPP has been defined in various ways,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll