header-logo header-logo

Two cheers for SLAPP legislation

23 May 2025 / Michael Bundock
Issue: 8117 / Categories: Features , Dispute resolution , CPR , Procedure & practice , Fraud
printer mail-detail
219530
Michael Bundock gives a muted welcome to the new rules
  • Anti-SLAPP legislation is at last on the statute book, although not yet in force. A defendant will be able to have a SLAPP claim struck out.
  • However, as this article explains, only limited forms of SLAPP are affected.

Journalists, publishers and lawyers have long been concerned that the courts can be used to stifle legitimate comment or criticism, a practice often referred to as strategic litigation against public participation (SLAPP). However, it is not always easy to distinguish between abusive behaviour and the ordinary stresses and strains of litigation, and introducing legislation has proved to be a slow process. In July 2022, the then government announced that it had fired ‘the opening salvo’ against SLAPP. Almost three years later, legislation has made its way on to the statute book, but it has yet to come into force and, even when it does, it is likely to disappoint campaigners.

SLAPP has been defined in various ways,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll