header-logo header-logo

28 May 2007 / Richard Miller
Issue: 7279 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Two cheers on three issues

The LSC has shown a willingness to listen in key areas affecting legal aid provision, says Richard Miller

At a time when the Legal Services Commission (LSC) is under intense fire, it deserves credit where it shows a willingness to listen and respond constructively to criticism. In three areas recently, the LSC has taken decisions that will benefit clients and firms alike.

SPECIALIST SUPPORT SAVED

Last year, the LSC unexpectedly announced that it was terminating the Specialist Support Service. This service enabled front-line advisers to phone an expert in social welfare law fields if they had a client with a problem that went beyond their capabilities. The specialist could assist the front-line adviser by explaining the law and guiding the adviser through the case; or if necessary, the specialist could take over the matter. In addition, the specialists were funded to provide training to enable more advisers to identify and advise on social welfare law problems. This was widely regarded as a valuable service, particularly to help address the growing problem

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll