header-logo header-logo

UK plc: limited safety?

02 March 2007 / Victoria Howes , Michael Appleby
Issue: 7262 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

UK health and safety laws are under the EC spotlight again. Victoria Howes and Michael Appleby explain why

Not for the first time the European Commission (the Commission) has brought proceedings against the UK alleging non-compliance with European laws in the area of health and safety. Numerous cases were brought in relation to non-compliance with the Working Time Directive 93/104/EC, for example. This time, the Commission alleged that the UK failed to transpose the Framework Directive 89/391/EEC (the Directive) concerning the prevention of occupational risks and the protection of the safety and health of workers (see European Commission v United Kingdom C – 127/05).

The original complaint was launched 10 years ago. The main thrust was that the qualifying phrase ‘so far as is reasonably practicable’ used by the UK in its primary legislation, the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (HSWA 1974), limited the scope of the employer’s obligation. This, the Commission argues, is incompatible with Art 5 of the Directive.

On 18 January 2007, Advocate General Mengozzi

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll