header-logo header-logo

UK plc: limited safety?

02 March 2007 / Victoria Howes , Michael Appleby
Issue: 7262 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

UK health and safety laws are under the EC spotlight again. Victoria Howes and Michael Appleby explain why

Not for the first time the European Commission (the Commission) has brought proceedings against the UK alleging non-compliance with European laws in the area of health and safety. Numerous cases were brought in relation to non-compliance with the Working Time Directive 93/104/EC, for example. This time, the Commission alleged that the UK failed to transpose the Framework Directive 89/391/EEC (the Directive) concerning the prevention of occupational risks and the protection of the safety and health of workers (see European Commission v United Kingdom C – 127/05).

The original complaint was launched 10 years ago. The main thrust was that the qualifying phrase ‘so far as is reasonably practicable’ used by the UK in its primary legislation, the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (HSWA 1974), limited the scope of the employer’s obligation. This, the Commission argues, is incompatible with Art 5 of the Directive.

On 18 January 2007, Advocate General Mengozzi

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll