header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 January 2023 / Cameron Brown KC , Olivia Haggar
Issue: 8008 / Categories: Opinion , Sanctions , Fraud , Criminal , International justice
printer mail-detail

Assessing the UK sanctions regime

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
With coffers depleted after months of costly war in Ukraine, where are we with UK sanctions? Cameron Brown KC & Olivia Haggar assess the new regime

It was a poorly-kept secret that the UK had fast become a haven for ‘dirty money’ flowing in from overseas jurisdictions. The Russian invasion of Ukraine brought this to the forefront of politics.

In a hurried response to the conflict, the government announced the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 (EC(TE)A 2022), which was expedited through Parliament and came into force on 15 March 2022. EC(TE)A 2022 introduced new powers, which joined the roster of other powers such as unexplained wealth orders (UWOs) and civil orders, and sought to toughen up the existing legislative framework for tackling economic crime.

One of the key changes introduced by EC(TE)A 2022 is the Register of Overseas Entities. Overseas entities that own (from 1 January 1999 in England and Wales) or wish to buy, sell, let or grant security over qualifying property

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll