header-logo header-logo

15 November 2007
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

UK tops Liberty terror holding chart

News

UK terrorist pre-charge detention powers—which the government is proposing to extend still further—already far exceed those in other comparable democracies, a new Liberty study shows.

The research, Terrorism Pre-charge Detention—Comparative Law Study, based on advice and assistance from lawyers and academics around the world, looked at 15 countries, including past and current potential terror targets such as the US, Spain, Russia, and Turkey.

None of these countries is allowed to hold terror suspects without charge for anything close to the 28 days British police are allowed, and yet the government is currently pushing to raise the limit to 56 days.
The US constitution limits pre-charge detention to 48 hours, Russian police are allowed to detain without charge for five days, while Turkish criminal law only permits 7.5 days’ detention before charge.

The report’s editor, Jago Russell, says the study provides further evidence that an increase beyond 28 days can not be justified.
“How can our government argue that the UK needs to hold people for over a month when the US can only hold people for two days and Canada just one?,” he says.

Liberty director Shami Chakrabarti says: “Ministers have rightly lectured generals in Burma and Pakistan about their rights record, but human rights, like charity, begins at home.”
 

Issue: 7297 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Two promoted to partner in property litigation and education teams

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Cross-border finance and restructuring specialist joins as of counsel in London

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

IP firm promotes litigator to partnership

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll