header-logo header-logo

UK tops Liberty terror holding chart

15 November 2007
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

News

UK terrorist pre-charge detention powers—which the government is proposing to extend still further—already far exceed those in other comparable democracies, a new Liberty study shows.

The research, Terrorism Pre-charge Detention—Comparative Law Study, based on advice and assistance from lawyers and academics around the world, looked at 15 countries, including past and current potential terror targets such as the US, Spain, Russia, and Turkey.

None of these countries is allowed to hold terror suspects without charge for anything close to the 28 days British police are allowed, and yet the government is currently pushing to raise the limit to 56 days.
The US constitution limits pre-charge detention to 48 hours, Russian police are allowed to detain without charge for five days, while Turkish criminal law only permits 7.5 days’ detention before charge.

The report’s editor, Jago Russell, says the study provides further evidence that an increase beyond 28 days can not be justified.
“How can our government argue that the UK needs to hold people for over a month when the US can only hold people for two days and Canada just one?,” he says.

Liberty director Shami Chakrabarti says: “Ministers have rightly lectured generals in Burma and Pakistan about their rights record, but human rights, like charity, begins at home.”
 

Issue: 7297 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
back-to-top-scroll