header-logo header-logo

An uncertain world

14 April 2017 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Andrew Francis offers some best practice guidance when advising developers on applications under s 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925

  • For developers there can be no escape from uncertainty in the context of s 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925.

  • There are four important points to bear in mind when advising developers on s 84 applications.

The one thing developers of land desire most is certainty. Apart from the certainty conferred by the ownership of title (at least where there is no risk of rectification of the register) the presence of full planning consent, completed s 106 agreements and community infrastructure levy payments, agreed funding, the ability to secure all services and access to the site and the absence of adverse third party rights are all matters which any developer wants “sewn up” before any work starts on the ground. Until resolved, the greatest cause of uncertainty will usually be third party rights. Outside disputed boundaries and claims to adverse possession, the worst offenders are prescriptive easements (especially light) and restrictive

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll