header-logo header-logo

27 March 2015 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Unconventional

piggot

Embassies’ employment immunities are in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights, as Charles Pigott reports

In Benkharbouche and Janah v Embassy of the Republic of Sudan and others [2015] EWCA Civ 33, [2015] All ER (D) 51 the Court of Appeal had to decide whether ss 4 and 16 of the State Immunity Act 1978 (SIA 1978) were effective to bar employment claims in the UK from London embassy service staff.

Ms Benkharbouche is a Moroccan national who was employed as a cook at the Sudanese embassy. Ms Janah, also Moroccan, worked as a member of the domestic staff at the Libyan embassy. Both brought claims for unfair dismissal and breaches of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833). Ms Janah also brought claims for racial discrimination and harassment.

Their claims were dismissed by the employment tribunal. The issue before the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) (which heard their appeals together in April 2013) and before the Court of Appeal was whether Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) in effect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll