header-logo header-logo

27 March 2015 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Unconventional

piggot

Embassies’ employment immunities are in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights, as Charles Pigott reports

In Benkharbouche and Janah v Embassy of the Republic of Sudan and others [2015] EWCA Civ 33, [2015] All ER (D) 51 the Court of Appeal had to decide whether ss 4 and 16 of the State Immunity Act 1978 (SIA 1978) were effective to bar employment claims in the UK from London embassy service staff.

Ms Benkharbouche is a Moroccan national who was employed as a cook at the Sudanese embassy. Ms Janah, also Moroccan, worked as a member of the domestic staff at the Libyan embassy. Both brought claims for unfair dismissal and breaches of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833). Ms Janah also brought claims for racial discrimination and harassment.

Their claims were dismissed by the employment tribunal. The issue before the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) (which heard their appeals together in April 2013) and before the Court of Appeal was whether Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) in effect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll