header-logo header-logo

Under placement orders

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Dorothea Gartland considers the impact of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 on placement orders

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Re B (children) [2008] EWCA Civ 835, [2008] All ER (D) 228 (Jul) offers advice and guidance to local authorities in respect of placement order applications. In this case the parents appealed against care orders made in respect of their children and a placement order in respect of the youngest child.

The local authority's adoption panel had met and considered the case of the youngest child but without having read the reports of two experts instructed in the case, a psychologist and child and adolescent psychiatrist. The local authority's director of social services endorsed the panel's decision the day after the panel and the local authority applied straight away for a placement order in respect of the youngest child. The parents sought an adjournment of the final hearing to enable the panel to reconsider the case having had sight of the experts' reports. The judge refused this application and made care orders and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll