header-logo header-logo

Unequal victims

15 April 2010 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Pleural plaque sufferers deserve better justice than a UK postal lottery, says Richard Scorer

Pleural plaques are a scarring on the lung caused by exposure to asbestos. Although they can often be a precursor to more serious asbestos related illnesses, for example mesothelioma, they are distinctive from other types of asbestos related conditions in that they are usually symptom free. The person afflicted by pleural plaques will not experience any physical pain or suffering, and in many cases will never become ill at all. However, the person afflicted may become very anxious about the possibility of developing asbestos related disease in the future, so psychological harm may be caused (see 159 NLJ 7396, p 1688 for the previous article on pleural plaques).

This gives rise to a legal problem: where the inhalation of asbestos fibres giving rise to pleural plaques is a result of negligence, eg by an employer, should persons suffering from pleural plaques be entitled to damages in the civil courts? In 2007 the House of Lords decided that, since no actual physical pain

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll