header-logo header-logo

15 April 2010 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Unequal victims

Pleural plaque sufferers deserve better justice than a UK postal lottery, says Richard Scorer

Pleural plaques are a scarring on the lung caused by exposure to asbestos. Although they can often be a precursor to more serious asbestos related illnesses, for example mesothelioma, they are distinctive from other types of asbestos related conditions in that they are usually symptom free. The person afflicted by pleural plaques will not experience any physical pain or suffering, and in many cases will never become ill at all. However, the person afflicted may become very anxious about the possibility of developing asbestos related disease in the future, so psychological harm may be caused (see 159 NLJ 7396, p 1688 for the previous article on pleural plaques).

This gives rise to a legal problem: where the inhalation of asbestos fibres giving rise to pleural plaques is a result of negligence, eg by an employer, should persons suffering from pleural plaques be entitled to damages in the civil courts? In 2007 the House of Lords decided that, since no actual physical pain

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll