header-logo header-logo

An unfair advantage?

Chris Bryden and Michael Salter warn against tampering with the “without prejudice” rule

It is a well-established doctrine that, subject to certain exceptions, written or oral communications made in a genuine attempt to compromise a dispute between the parties cannot be admitted in evidence. The “without prejudice” rule is a clear example of public policy, as the promotion of the settlement of disputes without recourse to litigation is a central aim in our legal system. It enshrines the principle that parties are able to negotiate openly without fear of being attacked by having their words quoted back at them in open court.

In the recent case of Brodie v Nicola Ward (t/a First Steps Nursery) [2008] All ER (D) 115 (Feb), UKEAT/0526/07, an employee attempted to overturn a ruling by the employment tribunal that a letter sent to her by solicitors acting for her employer was subject to the rule and therefore inadmissible. She argued that the letter amounted to a “last straw” that had caused her to resign and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott bolsters housebuilder expertise in Birmingham

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

NEWS
4PB chambers has announced the 2026 winner of its Alan Inglis Memorial Essay Prize, now in its third year
Murder could be split into first and second degrees, under Law Commission proposals for a historic overhaul of homicide offences
Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Australian-style ban on social media for under-16s will be difficult to enforce, lawyers have warned
One in two women in law say their current working pattern is unsustainable for their long-term health, according to a report by the Next 100 Years project
The Legal Services Board (LSB) has highlighted a lack of safeguards where people use artificial intelligence (AI) tools to help with legal problems
back-to-top-scroll