header-logo header-logo

18 October 2013
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Unfair dismissal

Rose v The Leeds Dental Team Ltd UKEAT/0016/13/DM, [2013] All ER (D) 70 (Oct)

The test in respect of whether or not there had been a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence did not require a tribunal to make a factual finding as to what the actual intention of the employer was; the employer’s subjective intention was irrelevant. If the employer acted in such a way, considered objectively, that his conduct was likely to destroy or seriously damage the relationship of trust and confidence, then he was taken to have the objective intention spoken of. There was no difference in practice between the test laid down by authorities over the past 30 years and the test adopted in Tullett Prebon plc v BGC Brokers LP [2011] IRLR 420. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll