header-logo header-logo

29 March 2018 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7787 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Unfair dismissal: protecting your brood

nlj_7787_pigott

Anomalies persist in the protection of pregnant women against dismissal, as Charles Pigott explains

  • According to current domestic case law, pregnant women continue to enjoy weaker protection while still at work compared to those already on maternity leave.
  • An opportunity to address this anomaly at a EU level was recently passed up by the European Court of Justice.

In Really Easy Car Credit v Thompson UKEAT 0197/17/0301 (unreported) the Employment Appeal Tribunal has confirmed that an employer must have actual knowledge of an employee’s pregnancy for a claim for pregnancy-related automatically unfair dismissal to succeed. It has also reiterated the orthodox position that an employer is not obliged to revisit a decision to dismiss once it becomes of aware of the pregnancy.

Domestic law

Leaving aside the provisions of the Equality Act relating to maternity and sex discrimination, the relevant law applying in Britain can be found in a combination of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA) and the Maternity and Parental Leave etc Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/3312) (MPL).

Under regulation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll