header-logo header-logo

04 December 2008 / Lorraine Jones
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

An unfair share?

Cohabitants still struggle to get a fair deal when their relationships break down, says Lorraine Jones

The law is often said to operate as a reflection of society upholding social and moral values while recognising the popular sense of fairness which individuals would seek to have applied to them.

That does not mean you get what you seek, rather that the framework of the law with the guidance of precedence is applied to each case upon its own facts and merits. Judicial discretion remains and thankfully so because there are cases where a party’s circumstance or contribution demands an adjustment or detraction from the overriding requirement of equality, provided that in itself would not be discriminatory or unfair. These are the basic principles applied to married couples, laid down in White v White [2001] 1 AC 596. But what of those couples who are not married? The Law Commission report published in July last year called “Cohabitation: The Financial
Consequences of Relationship Breakdown” highlighted the difficulties that couples, particularly those with children, were experiencing when

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll