header-logo header-logo

04 December 2008 / Lorraine Jones
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

An unfair share?

Cohabitants still struggle to get a fair deal when their relationships break down, says Lorraine Jones

The law is often said to operate as a reflection of society upholding social and moral values while recognising the popular sense of fairness which individuals would seek to have applied to them.

That does not mean you get what you seek, rather that the framework of the law with the guidance of precedence is applied to each case upon its own facts and merits. Judicial discretion remains and thankfully so because there are cases where a party’s circumstance or contribution demands an adjustment or detraction from the overriding requirement of equality, provided that in itself would not be discriminatory or unfair. These are the basic principles applied to married couples, laid down in White v White [2001] 1 AC 596. But what of those couples who are not married? The Law Commission report published in July last year called “Cohabitation: The Financial
Consequences of Relationship Breakdown” highlighted the difficulties that couples, particularly those with children, were experiencing when

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll