header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008 / Dr Nicholas Ryder
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

An unhappy coupling

The FSA and Northern Rock - where did it go wrong? Dr Nicholas Ryder

Three weeks after its election victory, the new Labour government announced in May 1997 that work would begin on the reform of the Financial Services Act 1986. The government sought to implement a new financial regulatory regime which would set basic standards and prevent systematic failure. The proposals were contained in the Financial Services and Markets Bill 1998, which contained three important features:

·                                   

●     The creation of a single financial regulatory authority, which would have a clearly defined set of statutory objectives, functions and powers;

·                                   

●     the historic role of the Bank of England was to be revised; and

·                                   

●     the principle of self-regulation was to be abandoned.

The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA 2000) provided a single statutory framework for the Financial Services Authority (FSA). Under the Act, the FSA regulates and authorises members of the regulated sector

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll