header-logo header-logo

Unhappy New Year

comment1_4

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter start 2011 by batting off derogatory claims

As the clock turns to 2011 yet another salvo is fired in the ongoing battle against lawyers and their kind. This time the target was firmly trained on employment lawyers, with an article in The Times on 4 January 2011 by Helen Giles, an HR director, which was excoriating in its account of the “legal extortion” practised by employment tribunals and the “parasitical” lawyers bringing claims therein.

The authors make no secret of the fact that one of them practises exclusively in the field of employment while employment law represents a significant part of that of the other. It is perhaps not surprising therefore that the “parasites” might wish to respond. However, notwithstanding the vested interest of the authors in the practice of employment law, the position set out by Ms Giles in her article is not recognised by these practitioners.

False

In parts the article is simply wrong. For instance in proposing reform it advocates that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll