header-logo header-logo

Uninsured loss recovery claim fails to sail

05 June 2024
Issue: 8074 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insurers have lost a claim for priority over uninsured losses where money has been recovered, in a shipping case

Royal Sun Alliance & Ors v Textainer & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 547 concerned a dispute between insurers, who had paid out under excess of loss policies, and Textainer, a large container lessor, following the collapse of Textainer’s lessee Hanjin Shipping in 2016.

The case centred on whether the insurers were entitled to a proportionate share of $15m (£11.7m) recoveries subsequently made by Textainer, or whether those recoveries should be applied first to uninsured losses, as per the ‘top down’ approach adopted by the House of Lords in Lord Napier and Ettrick v Hunter [1993] AC 713.

The Court of Appeal reaffirmed that recoveries made by Textainer were to be applied on a ‘top down’ basis rather than on a proportionate basis.

BDM partner David McInnes said: ‘We are very happy with this important and comprehensive victory for our clients Textainer, which reaffirms key principles of the English law of insurance and subrogation.’

Issue: 8074 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll