header-logo header-logo

20 September 2007
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

United action planned to fight legal aid reform

News

Criminal lawyer groups have agreed to join forces and speak with one voice—led by the Law Society—when negotiating with the Legal Services Commission  (LSC) over legal aid reforms. The united action will kick off with a national demonstration on Monday 5 November.

In a statement the London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association, Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association, Criminal Defence Solicitors Union, Association of Major London Criminal Law Firms and Independent Lawyers Group say they will be part of a single negotiating team with an agreed set of objectives.
“We want this to be a transparent process, and to ensure that there will be no separate bilateral meetings between any organisation and the LSC and government without the negotiating team being kept informed,” the group says.

The move comes after the LSC announced the determination of the general criminal contract, with new contracts to be dated from 14 January 2008 for a period of six months. There will be an invitation to express an interest and only firms that respond will be considered for a contract.

Contracts will be awarded if lawyers continue to meet the “contractual requirements” and accept all the changes but the contract will be for only a six-month period, to be followed by a move to the existing unified contract in July 2008.

A further consultation paper on best value tendering will be issued and the LSC’s final proposals on the graduated litigator fee scheme are yet to be announced. The LSC still intends to impose on 14 January 2008: fixed fees in the police station; graduated litigators fees in the Crown court (subject to the outcome of the consultation); a new very high cost cases panel; the routing of all calls via the defence solicitor call centre; and the expansion of Criminal Defence Service Direct.

The action group says: “Our associations have been informed by many of their owner members that they feel unable to continue to provide out of hours services in the police station due to the constraints of underfunding. Pending the regional and London meetings, and the advice of the Law Society, the professional associations urge you all not to take any steps to indicate interest in future contracting on unfair and uneconomic terms.”

The LSC says it is confident that the majority of firms will sign up to the new criminal contract in January, adding that if firms do not register for a new criminal contract their work will be reallocated to “other providers who have expressed an interest in expansion”.

Issue: 7298 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll