header-logo header-logo

09 May 2017
Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

The University of Law

ULaw appoints three new centre directors

The University of Law (ULaw) has appointed new directors in Bristol and at its two London centres.

Jill Howell-Williams and Sandie Gaines have been appointed as centre directors of ULaw’s London Moorgate and Bloomsbury centres respectively, while Zoe King will lead in the same capacity at ULaw’s centre in Bristol.

Jill, a qualified barrister and solicitor specialising in mergers and acquisitions and private equity work, joined ULaw in 1997. Jill has held various managerial positions at ULaw, including being head of the Moorgate Centre’s academic staff. During her time with ULaw, she has accumulated extensive teaching experience on the LPC, GDL, LLM and professional development programmes, and was appointed associate professor in 2012.

Sandie, who has been centre director at ULaw in Manchester, is a qualified solicitor with specialist expertise in criminal and employment law and had significant success in managing and driving new business in Manchester. She began her career at the University in 2009 teaching business law and practice, mergers and acquisitions and contract law, and later was appointed an associate professor.

Zoe will lead ULaw in Bristol following a period of time as its interim centre director. She trained and worked as a solicitor at Burges Salmon in Bristol before joining ULaw in 2011 – a year after the Bristol centre first opened. Zoe has been instrumental in the delivery of the LPC and GDL programmes to students across the Bristol and Exeter campuses, and previously was student lead for the GDL and LLB programmes.

Professor Andrea Nollent, vice-chancellor & CEO at ULaw, said: 'We are committed to delivering the best training for legal firms while continuing to promote innovation in the market. With many developments in the legal sector currently underway, these appointments are a testament to our dedication to provide students across our centres with the highest quality of education while at the same time supporting some of our brightest academic talent.'

Professor Bill Bruce, pro-vice-chancellor, said: 'We are lucky to be in a position to appoint three outstanding individuals to these vital roles. The combination of Jill, Sandie and Zoe’s previous practice expertise, and their understanding of ULaw, puts them in a strong position to lead three key centres through the challenges and opportunities provided by our new strategic plan.'

Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll