header-logo header-logo

05 November 2015
Issue: 7675 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Unlimited fines for corporate offences

Sentencing guidelines will “send a chill through corporate UK”

Companies face a hike in fines from next February for health and safety, food safety and hygiene offences, and corporate manslaughter.

New Sentencing Council guidelines, published this week and due to take effect on 1 February 2016, provide for unlimited fines and a starting point of £7.5m on organisations with a turnover of more than £50m, for corporate manslaughter. Smaller organisations with a turnover of up to £2m could face a fine of £450,000 or more.

The guidelines cover offences committed by organisations and individuals in the course of their professional lives only. The guidelines must be followed unless the judge or magistrate believes this would not be in the interests of justice. However, judges will also be asked to take into account the offending organisation’s profit margin, and the impact the sentence may have on its employees and on its ability to make restitution to victims.

Fines for organisations committing food safety offences range from £100 to £3m, depending on severity and level of culpability. For individuals who breach safety and food hygiene regulations, the penalty could be up to two years in custody or/and an unlimited fine.

Gerard Forlin QC, of Cornerstone Barristers, says the guidelines will “send a chill through corporate UK”.

“Many defendants, particularly larger ones and individuals, will feel it unfair that a sentence imposed on 1 February 2016 could be, say ten times higher than for the same offence on 31 January 2016. This will make the advising of corporations and individuals very difficult for lawyers, and I envisage many procedural difficulties and hurdles will need to be overcome by the courts, particularly in the early stages.”

Jon Cooper, partner at Bond Dickinson LLP, says: “In the majority of cases, fines for health and safety offences will go through the roof. For example, a recent prosecution of Baxters Food Group Limited resulting in a fine of £60,000 for a non-fatal accident might, under the new guidance, increase to a fine between £550,000 and £2.9m.”

Laura Cameron, partner at Pinsent Masons, says: “Many of those currently subject to proceedings may be well advised to enter early guilty pleas in appropriate cases in order to expedite their cases.”

 
Issue: 7675 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll