header-logo header-logo

10 July 2009 / Craig Rose
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Opinion , Judicial review , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

(Un)orthodox selection

JFS pupil selection: race discrimination or religious freedom? asks Craig Rose

The Court of Appeal has affirmed that Jewish schools can give preference to Jewish children in their selection policies, but has effectively made it impossible for them to apply the age-old Orthodox Jewish religious criteria for determining whether or not someone is Jewish (see R (on the application of E) v Governing Body of the Jews’ Free School (the United Synagogue intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 626, [2009] All ER (D) 260 (Jun)).

The definition of Jewishness in Halachah, the ancient body of Jewish law, is simple—you are Jewish if you were born of a mother who was herself Jewish by birth or conversion. It’s irrelevant that your father was Jewish or not Jewish. Nor does it matter what a person believes or practises. As long as he was born of a Jewish mother, an atheist who eats pork chops on Yom Kippur is as much a Jew as the Chief Rabbi. This reflects the fundamental tenet of Orthodox Judaism that the Jews are a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll