header-logo header-logo

An unsubstantial budget?

01 December 2017 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7772 / Categories: Opinion , Tax
printer mail-detail
nlj_7772_cover

Peter Vaines reflects on some good jokes but little else of substance in the Chancellor’s recent announcements

Having a full blown Budget in November is a bit of a shock to the system after a lifetime of Spring Budgets—but I am sure we will get used to it.

Nine years ago when the financial crisis was just upon us, I remember writing a piece in this journal about the impending Budget. My finely tuned antennae enabled me to predict that the situation was so serious that the Chancellor’s speech would only contain matters of real substance—because it was too important for sound bites and political point scoring which were not going to cut the mustard. We were going to need measures which would really work. Unfortunately not…I was so wrong it was embarrassing.

Plus ça change. The situation is still pretty serious (although maybe for different reasons) but poor Mr Hammond could not afford to do anything of substance. If he did, it would mean that people would have to pay something—and that would be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mike Wilson, Blake Morgan

NLJ Career Profile: Mike Wilson, Blake Morgan

Mike Wilson, managing partner of Blake Morgan chair of the CBI’s South-East Council, reflects on his career the challenges that have defined him

Clarke Willmott—Alexandria Kittlety

Clarke Willmott—Alexandria Kittlety

Partner joins commercial property team in Birmingham

Birketts—Will MacFarlane & Sarah Dodds

Birketts—Will MacFarlane & Sarah Dodds

Family team expands with double appointment in Bristol office

NEWS
Lawyers have expressed dismay at the Chancellor Rachel Reeve’s decision to impose a £2,000 cap on salary sacrifice contributions
NLJ is inviting its readers to take part in this year’s annual reader research, a short survey designed to help shape the future direction of the magazine. The questionnaire consists of just eight quick questions and offers an opportunity for legal professionals to share their views on the content, coverage and issues that matter most to them.
The Law Society has urged regulators not to ban the term ‘no win no fee’, as the profession contemplates measures to prevent a disaster like the SSB Group collapse from happening again
The legal profession's leaders have mounted a robust defence of trial by jury, following reports that Justice Secretary David Lammy is considering restricting it to rape, murder, manslaughter and other cases that are in the public interest
CILEX (the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives) has been granted permission to appeal Mazur, a decision which has caused consternation among litigation firms
back-to-top-scroll