header-logo header-logo

01 December 2017 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7772 / Categories: Opinion , Tax
printer mail-detail

An unsubstantial budget?

nlj_7772_cover

Peter Vaines reflects on some good jokes but little else of substance in the Chancellor’s recent announcements

Having a full blown Budget in November is a bit of a shock to the system after a lifetime of Spring Budgets—but I am sure we will get used to it.

Nine years ago when the financial crisis was just upon us, I remember writing a piece in this journal about the impending Budget. My finely tuned antennae enabled me to predict that the situation was so serious that the Chancellor’s speech would only contain matters of real substance—because it was too important for sound bites and political point scoring which were not going to cut the mustard. We were going to need measures which would really work. Unfortunately not…I was so wrong it was embarrassing.

Plus ça change. The situation is still pretty serious (although maybe for different reasons) but poor Mr Hammond could not afford to do anything of substance. If he did, it would mean that people would have to pay something—and that would be the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll