header-logo header-logo

Updated lawmakers' guide now available

24 July 2024
Categories: Legal News , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
Civil rights group JUSTICE has launched the latest edition of its Law for Lawmakers guide, due to land on MPs' desks this week

Law for Lawmakers provides up-to-date, easy-to-follow and highly relevant assistance to help MPs navigate lawmaking and protect the rule of law, following recent controversies such as the Rwanda policy and proroguing Parliament during the Brexit years.

It explains key legal and constitutional principles in a readable format, with an abundance of references to recent events. The guide covers UK primary and secondary legislation, the process for tabling amendments, the lawmaking journey, EU law, judicial review, international law, constitutional conventions and much more.

The guide was first published in 2015, and has been updated with the support of law firm A&O Shearman.

Andrew Denny, head of UK public law at A&O Shearman, said: ‘51% of MPs are sitting in Parliament for the first time so this guide couldn’t be more relevant.’

JUSTICE will offer training opportunities and clinics on the guide for MPs and their staff over the coming months.

Fiona Rutherford, chief executive of JUSTICE, said: ‘Where the rule of law is badly eroded, the results—rushed, poorly scrutinised new laws, and threats to judicial independence, for example—hurt us all.’

The guide has also been endorsed by the current attorney general, Lord Richard Hermer KC, and former Lord Chancellor Alex Chalk KC. 

Lord Richard said the guide ‘is an incredibly useful resource in introducing some of the key legal and constitutional principles which lawmakers will encounter’.

Alex Chalk said: ‘The rule of law isn’t an airy, quaint, historic notion—it’s the essential underpinning of a modern, safe, prosperous and fair society.

‘It’s what ensures the guilty are convicted and the innocent walk free. It’s what ensures injustices are put right even when the wrongdoer is powerful. And it’s what promotes Britain's international reputation and attracts investment.

‘But the world of the law, of bewigged judges and judicial review, can feel like a secret garden to MPs—to new ones in particular. This excellent guide gives them the key.’

Download the guide here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll