header-logo header-logo

Updates from the courts

Paul Hewitt, Paola Fudakowska & Adam Cloherty on the intricacies of will interpretation

It is somehow comforting that, even in this day and age, five law lords can be exercised about the meaning to be attributed to a semi-colon. In Sammut v Manzi [2008] UKPC 58 T died leaving a will in which, by cl 6(ii), 25% of his estate was left “to (a) my cousins…[A], [P], [W] and [J]; and (b) my ex-spouse [R]… in equal shares as to the realty in fee simple and as to the personalty absolutely”. The clause went on to record that if any of A, P, W, J and/or R should predecease T without leaving heirs, “the share of that deceased individual shall be paid… to the surviving beneficiaries…in equal shares and, if…more than one…among all such surviving beneficiaries in equal shares per stirpes.”

Do A, P, W, J and R each take 5% each? Or do the four cousins share 12.5% while R takes the remaining 12.5% herself? The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll