header-logo header-logo

11 June 2021 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7936 / Categories: Features , International justice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

US Supreme Court: Dissenting adults

50769
Neil Parpworth provides a recent example of the US Supreme Court’s approach to the expression of dissent
  • Torres v Madrid: the facts; the legal issue; the authorities.

One of the means by which the success of a US presidency is sometimes determined is by having regard to the number of presidential nominees who have been installed in the Supreme Court during a president’s four-year tenure. Using this measure, Donald Trump’s presidency was a success in that three appointments to the highest court were secured, whereas Jimmy Carter’s presidency was a failure in that no new justices were appointed between 1977-1981.

However, given that justices are appointed for life, opportunities to appoint new members simply may not arise during a presidency so long as the incumbents remain fit and healthy and have no intention to retire. At the time of writing, six of the justices have been appointed under a Republican presidency and only three under a Democrat presidency. This imbalance is of course important given the nature

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll