header-logo header-logo

26 June 2009 / Ayla Dogruyol
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Features , Family , Property
printer mail-detail

Use your experts wisely

In times of recession, proportionality over the use of experts is critical,
says Ayla Dogruyol

Married couples are continuing to separate despite the financial difficulties of doing so when assets have devalued and may not be readily realisable. Some will be concerned about the cost implications of formalising their separation and this article highlights two practical steps which parties can consider to contain costs when doing a deal in relation to the finances.

The judge at a final hearing bases his decision on the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25 which requires consideration of the financial resources available to the parties now and in the foreseeable future. Consequently, at the outset of any settlement discussions the parties should be satisfied that all the assets have been disclosed. They then have to work out what those assets are worth.

Experts

Parties are first encouraged to try to agree the value of the family assets. In the absence of agreement, or if they do not know the value of the assets, the preferred court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll