header-logo header-logo

26 June 2009 / Ayla Dogruyol
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Features , Family , Property
printer mail-detail

Use your experts wisely

In times of recession, proportionality over the use of experts is critical,
says Ayla Dogruyol

Married couples are continuing to separate despite the financial difficulties of doing so when assets have devalued and may not be readily realisable. Some will be concerned about the cost implications of formalising their separation and this article highlights two practical steps which parties can consider to contain costs when doing a deal in relation to the finances.

The judge at a final hearing bases his decision on the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25 which requires consideration of the financial resources available to the parties now and in the foreseeable future. Consequently, at the outset of any settlement discussions the parties should be satisfied that all the assets have been disclosed. They then have to work out what those assets are worth.

Experts

Parties are first encouraged to try to agree the value of the family assets. In the absence of agreement, or if they do not know the value of the assets, the preferred court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll