header-logo header-logo

Value added tax—Supply of goods or services—Single supply or separate supplies

05 October 2012
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP v Revenue and Customs Commissioners: C-392/11 [2012] All ER (D) 163 (Sep)

Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber), Judges Lõhmus, President of Chamber, Rosas (Rapporteur), Fernlund, 27 Sep 2012

The Court of Justice has given guidance on the question of “single supply” for the purposes of Art 137(1)(d) of Council Directive (EC) 2006/112 (on the common system of value added tax) (the VAT Directive).

The applicant was a firm of solicitors with offices leased in London. The lease provided that the premises were let in consideration of the payment of three “rents”, corresponding to (i) occupation of the premises; (ii) to the firm’s share of the cost of insuring the building; and (iii) to the provision of services which the landlord was obliged under the lease to provide. The third category consisted of service charges including supply of water and heating, repair of the structure and machinery of the building, cleaning and security. The lease provided that if

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll