header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008 / Peter Ashford
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Features , Banking , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Valuing the Rock

How will compensation for Northern Rock shareholders be assessed? Peter Ashford investigates

Northern Rock plc entered into public ownership on 22 February 2008 after failure to secure a takeover from the private sector. The mechanism of the nationalisation was to transfer all of the existing shares into the name of the Treasury Solicitor as nominee for the Treasury. No compensation was paid to the shareholders at the time of the transfer, but ever since there have been calls for greater clarity of how that compensation will be assessed and paid. Unusually, even the institutional investors, and in particular Legal & General, have made calls for this clarification.

In fact much of the detailed procedures for compensation are set out in the primary and secondary legislation authorising the privatisation.

The primary legislation is the Banking (Special Provisions) Act 2008 (B(SP)A 2008). B(SP)A 2008 permits, in effect, privatisation for the purposes of “maintaining the stability of the financial system” and “protecting the public interest”. Section 5

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll