header-logo header-logo

11 November 2016
Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

VAT

St Andrew’s College Bradfield v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2016] UKUT 491 (TCC), [2016] All ER (D) 38 (Nov)

The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (the tribunal) dismissed the appeal by St Andrew’s College, Bradfield, against a decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) which had decided that the supplies of sports services by the college’s subsidiary companies did not qualify for exemption from VAT under s 31 of and item 3 of Group 10 of Sch 9 to the Value Added Tax Act 1994, as supplies by an eligible body of services closely linked with and essential to sport or physical education. The tribunal decided that exemption should not be afforded in a case where the constitution of the relevant body, as it stood at the relevant time, would permit distribution of profits to a body which was not an eligible body even if, on the facts of the case, distributions could in practice be distributed only to an eligible body.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Sally Ann Masih, Suzy Overton & Jane Beaumont

Switalskis—Sally Ann Masih, Suzy Overton & Jane Beaumont

Trio of recruits strengthens Switalskis residential property team

Ward Hadaway—Steven Hayward

Ward Hadaway—Steven Hayward

Birmingham law firm appoints construction partner

Flint Bishop—six appointments

Flint Bishop—six appointments

Flint Bishop accelerates Northern growth through strategic senior appointments

NEWS
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
Jonathan Fisher KC’s wide-ranging fraud report contains worthwhile proposals, but turning them into workable reform will require money, capacity and political will
back-to-top-scroll