header-logo header-logo

04 December 2008
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

VAT change warning to legal practices

Profession

The chancellor’s decision to reduce VAT payable by 2.1% in last week’s Pre-Budget Report could mean legal practices will have to make considerable changes to stay compliant.

Andy Harris of Hazelwoods LLP says: “As a solicitor, most supplies are covered by the normal tax point rules, that is, the date that determines which VAT rate is applicable.

“The tax point is the earlier date of completion of the work, the invoice date or the date payment is received.”

Harris says that for single supplies carried out over a period of time spanning the change in rate, for example the preparation of a will, the whole supply can be charged at the new rate, except where service was provided more than 14 days before you issue the invoice.

Harris says, however, that HM Revenue & Customs are offering a degree of fl exibility as firms come to terms with the changes. “They have announced they will be operating a ‘light touch’ in terms of errors made in the first VAT return after the change.

“If you discover any errors on a VAT return you can correct it in the normal way by making a voluntary disclosure or by correcting it on your
next return,” he adds.

 

Issue: 7348 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll