header-logo header-logo

Very beaky

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil Way

Family advocates should be ready to spend more time in the magistrates’ courts. The ethos behind the Allocation and Transfer of Proceedings Order 2008 (SI 2008/2836) which substantially comes into force on 25 November 2008, and the complementary President’s Practice Direction (PD) issued on 3 November 2008 is to push more private law family work under the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) and Pt IV of the Family Law Act 1996 (FLA 1996) down to magistrates and hope that they keep it. The aim is have a quarter of these cases heard by the beaks. The Children (Allocation of Proceedings) Order 1991 (SI 1991/1677) and the Family Law Act 1996 (Part IV) (Allocation of Proceedings) Order 1997 (SI 1997/1896), with their amendments, and the Children (Allocation of Proceedings) (Appeals) Order 1991 (SI 1991/180) are repealed in their entirety. So:

Among those proceedings that must now be started in a magistrates’ court are for parental responsibility by father or step-parent unless a ChA 1989, s 8 application is made at the same time or the child is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll