header-logo header-logo

21 June 2018 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7798 / Categories: Bar Council , Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

A very English scandal

nlj_7798_cover

Alec Samuels shares his reflections on the legal significance of the Jeremy Thorpe case

The trial of Jeremy Thorpe, covered recently in the BBC drama, A Very English Scandal , took place nearly 40 years ago. The trial makes a good story and good drama, despite the passing of time. But what is the continuing legal significance of the case? Some of the legal issues have been resolved, some are still very much with us.

Conspiracy

In moral terms conspiracy to commit a serious crime is almost as bad as actually committing the crime, and involving others as well may be seen as an aggravating factor. However, to the jury the intention and the agreement will not seem as bad as an execution of the conspiracy. Furthermore, the execution, the act, would probably have been clear cut, whereas the mere preliminary agreement may be very unclear and uncertain. The intent was not to shoot and kill the alleged victim but merely to frighten him off, say the defence. A conspiracy is indeed admitted,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll