header-logo header-logo

A very English scandal

21 June 2018 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7798 / Categories: Bar Council , Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
nlj_7798_cover

Alec Samuels shares his reflections on the legal significance of the Jeremy Thorpe case

The trial of Jeremy Thorpe, covered recently in the BBC drama, A Very English Scandal , took place nearly 40 years ago. The trial makes a good story and good drama, despite the passing of time. But what is the continuing legal significance of the case? Some of the legal issues have been resolved, some are still very much with us.

Conspiracy

In moral terms conspiracy to commit a serious crime is almost as bad as actually committing the crime, and involving others as well may be seen as an aggravating factor. However, to the jury the intention and the agreement will not seem as bad as an execution of the conspiracy. Furthermore, the execution, the act, would probably have been clear cut, whereas the mere preliminary agreement may be very unclear and uncertain. The intent was not to shoot and kill the alleged victim but merely to frighten him off, say the defence. A conspiracy is indeed admitted,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll