header-logo header-logo

A very English scandal

21 June 2018 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7798 / Categories: Bar Council , Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
nlj_7798_cover

Alec Samuels shares his reflections on the legal significance of the Jeremy Thorpe case

The trial of Jeremy Thorpe, covered recently in the BBC drama, A Very English Scandal , took place nearly 40 years ago. The trial makes a good story and good drama, despite the passing of time. But what is the continuing legal significance of the case? Some of the legal issues have been resolved, some are still very much with us.

Conspiracy

In moral terms conspiracy to commit a serious crime is almost as bad as actually committing the crime, and involving others as well may be seen as an aggravating factor. However, to the jury the intention and the agreement will not seem as bad as an execution of the conspiracy. Furthermore, the execution, the act, would probably have been clear cut, whereas the mere preliminary agreement may be very unclear and uncertain. The intent was not to shoot and kill the alleged victim but merely to frighten him off, say the defence. A conspiracy is indeed admitted,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Partner joins as lead of international tax desk

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

International arbitration partner joins disputes team in London

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Firm celebrates strong retention and new talent across practice areas

NEWS
MPs have expressed disappointment after the government confirmed it will not consider updating the parental leave system until at least 2027
In his latest 'Civil way' column for this week's NLJ, Stephen Gold delivers a witty roundup of procedural updates and judicial oddities. From the rise in litigant-in-person hourly rates (£24 from October) to the Supreme Court’s venue hire options (canapés in Courtroom 1, anyone?), Gold blends legal insight with dry humour
In July, the Supreme Court quashed the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, ruling that trial judges had wrongly directed juries to treat profit-motivated Libor submissions as inherently dishonest. In this week’s NLJ, David Stern and James Fletcher of 5 St Andrew’s Hill reflect on the decision
Lord Neuberger, former president of the Supreme Court, shares his views on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in this week's NLJ with William Raven
In this week's issue of NLJ, Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham of Birketts unpack the high-conflict financial remedy case TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1659 (Fam). The husband’s conduct—described by the judge as a ‘masterclass in gaslighting’—included hiding a £9.5m deferred payment from the sale of a port acquired post-separation. Despite his claims that the port was non-matrimonial, the court found its value rooted in marital assets and efforts
back-to-top-scroll