header-logo header-logo

06 February 2026 / Sarah Wood , Barnaby Hone , Gary Pons
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Crypto , Fraud , Cybercrime , Technology
printer mail-detail

Victims’ rights in the crypto age

241909
Gary Pons, Sarah Wood & Barnaby Hone consider the approach to cryptoassets under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
  • This article examines the variety of methods at the disposal of UK authorities under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to seize, detain or freeze, and recover or forfeit cryptoassets.
  • It also analyses the ways in which victims can make a claim for the return of their property within those schemes.

In late September 2025, Yadi Zhang pleaded guilty to an offence of money laundering involving 61,000 Bitcoin, which at that time was estimated to be worth more than £5bn. The seizure of the Bitcoin has been touted as one of the single largest cryptocurrency seizures in the world. The underlying criminality is the Lantian Gerui investment fraud involving about 128,000 Chinese victims.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) commenced civil recovery proceedings in respect of the seized Bitcoin under Pt 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) on 18

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll