header-logo header-logo

23 February 2017
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Victory for domestic abuse victims

Justice Secretary Liz Truss is scrapping time limits that prevent victims of domestic violence from seeking legal aid for family court hearings on child custody and contact.

Currently, victims have to demonstrate that they have been targeted by their abuser in the past five years in order to qualify for legal aid for private family law proceedings. The alternative is that they represent themselves, which often means confronting their abuser in court.

However, the Prisons and Courts Bill, published this week, abolishes the five-year limit, and also broadens the scope of acceptable “gateway evidence” to include statements from organisations working with victims.

Polly Neate, chief executive of Women’s Aid, said: “This is a breakthrough for the safety of children and their mothers who have been placed in the unthinkable position of facing their abuser in court.

“Women’s Aid is incredibly grateful for the speed at which Liz Truss has acted on a key demand of our Child First campaign. It is critical this legislation is followed by clear and firm guidance for judges, and we look forward to working with government and the President of the Family Division.”

The move follows a long campaign by domestic abuse and women’s rights campaigners including Rights of Women, which last year brought a successful Court of Appeal challenge against the evidence requirement for domestic abuse victims. The time limit for legal aid applications was subsequently extended from two to five years after an abusive incident could be proven.

Prime Minister Theresa May announced plans earlier this month to bring forward a Domestic Violence and Abuse Act to better protect victims.  

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll