header-logo header-logo

23 February 2017
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Victory for domestic abuse victims

Justice Secretary Liz Truss is scrapping time limits that prevent victims of domestic violence from seeking legal aid for family court hearings on child custody and contact.

Currently, victims have to demonstrate that they have been targeted by their abuser in the past five years in order to qualify for legal aid for private family law proceedings. The alternative is that they represent themselves, which often means confronting their abuser in court.

However, the Prisons and Courts Bill, published this week, abolishes the five-year limit, and also broadens the scope of acceptable “gateway evidence” to include statements from organisations working with victims.

Polly Neate, chief executive of Women’s Aid, said: “This is a breakthrough for the safety of children and their mothers who have been placed in the unthinkable position of facing their abuser in court.

“Women’s Aid is incredibly grateful for the speed at which Liz Truss has acted on a key demand of our Child First campaign. It is critical this legislation is followed by clear and firm guidance for judges, and we look forward to working with government and the President of the Family Division.”

The move follows a long campaign by domestic abuse and women’s rights campaigners including Rights of Women, which last year brought a successful Court of Appeal challenge against the evidence requirement for domestic abuse victims. The time limit for legal aid applications was subsequently extended from two to five years after an abusive incident could be proven.

Prime Minister Theresa May announced plans earlier this month to bring forward a Domestic Violence and Abuse Act to better protect victims.  

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll