header-logo header-logo

04 November 2016 / Mark Walker
Issue: 7721 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A view from above

nlj_7721_walker

Flight delays & missed connections with non-EC carriers: Mark Walker reports

  • Passengers entitlement to compensation under the Denied Boarding Regulation for delay in respect of “missed connections”.
  • An analysis of whether the passenger holding a “through-ticket” is entitled to compensation based on the length of delay arriving at the passenger’s final destination if the intermediate airport is outside the EC and the carrier is a “non-community carrier”.

This problem concerns passengers’ entitlement to compensation under Art 7 of EC Reg 261/2004 (the “Denied Boarding Regulation”) for delay in respect of “missed connections”, whereby a short delay on the first flight leaving an EC airport, results in the passenger missing his or her connecting flight, usually causing a long delay arriving at the passenger’s final destination.

The question being asked is whether such a passenger holding a “through-ticket” is entitled to compensation based on the length of delay arriving at their final destination if the intermediate airport is outside the EC and the carrier is a “non-community carrier”. This is a very common

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll