header-logo header-logo

The view from the bench

05 December 2014 / Elizabeth Metliss
Issue: 7633 / Categories: Features , In Court
printer mail-detail
elizabeth-metliss

In the first in a series of articles, Elizabeth Metliss considers the judicial view of aggressive correspondence

Mr Justice Burton recently came to Mishcon de Reya’s offices to give an insight into “the view from the bench”—how judges view various aspects of the litigation process, and in particular, how they view the conduct and practices of law firms in this context. This article, the first of a series of three, outlines how Burton J and his contemporaries from the judiciary view three issues—issues which litigators have to deal with on a day-to-day basis when running cases for their clients.

Taking a hard line

This first piece addresses how judges perceive correspondence, particularly aggressive correspondence, between law firms. As litigators, we use correspondence to set out our client’s position to the other side. Correspondence can relate to procedural issues and often deals with differences in factual accounts and points of law; it can be used to undermine the other side’s position, sometimes in an aggressive, accusatory way, and/or to show that your client

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll