header-logo header-logo

19 March 2010 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7409 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Village warfare

Are village greens the new weapon of choice against property developers? Malcolm Dowden investigates

The Supreme Court has handed a major victory to a group of local residents in Redcar, allowing them to thwart a development proposal by securing registration of the land as a town or village green. The decision will encourage objectors elsewhere to consider similar tactics, establishing village greens as a weapon of choice in “guerrilla warfare” against property developers.

The Commons Act 2006 made it easier to apply for registration of land as a town or village green. Registration is possible where “a significant number of the inhabitants of any locality, or of any neighbourhood within a locality, have indulged as of right in lawful sports and pastimes on the land for a period of at least 20 years”.

In R (Lewis) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council [2010] UKSC 11 a resident of Redcar, together with some other local residents, applied under s 15(4) of the 2006 Act to have a piece of land in Redcar registered as a town or

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll