header-logo header-logo

19 March 2010 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7409 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Village warfare

Are village greens the new weapon of choice against property developers? Malcolm Dowden investigates

The Supreme Court has handed a major victory to a group of local residents in Redcar, allowing them to thwart a development proposal by securing registration of the land as a town or village green. The decision will encourage objectors elsewhere to consider similar tactics, establishing village greens as a weapon of choice in “guerrilla warfare” against property developers.

The Commons Act 2006 made it easier to apply for registration of land as a town or village green. Registration is possible where “a significant number of the inhabitants of any locality, or of any neighbourhood within a locality, have indulged as of right in lawful sports and pastimes on the land for a period of at least 20 years”.

In R (Lewis) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council [2010] UKSC 11 a resident of Redcar, together with some other local residents, applied under s 15(4) of the 2006 Act to have a piece of land in Redcar registered as a town or

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll