header-logo header-logo

15 February 2017
Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Vincents

Firm's PI team triples in a year 

An upsurge in work over the last year has seen Vincents Solicitors triple the size of its RTA department with nine new hires. The team, which helps victims of road traffic accidents make personal injury claims, has appointed three new fee earners, five support staff, and a new apprentice to service the growing workload.

Sara Kiran is a newly qualified solicitor who has come to Vincents from Clearwater Solicitors in Burnley where she worked as a paralegal in the PI running RTA cases.

Paralegal Anthony Harrison has joined from Zest Legal in Manchester where he worked for four years. A litigator with more than 15 years’ experience is used to handling complex fast track and multitrack cases.

Tasneem Shaffa, a paralegal who joins Vincents from DWF where she worked on the defence of PI claims, experience which is assisting the team in the successful presentation of claims cases. 

Other recent recruits include three experienced RTA litigation executives: Rachel Varrie, formally Bromley Holcroft in Southport; Michelle Mitchell, from Slater and Gordon in Blackpool; and Simon Waller from Keoghs Solicitors in Bolton. Holly Nihill has been brought in to support the team as administration assistant together with Alison Smith who has transferred in to the RTA department from another department within the firm.

Ben Greensmith was also been taken on as an apprentice, providing admin assistance to the fee earning team, learning the procedures and processes needed to successfully secure compensation for the firm’s clients, with a view to progressing to a fee-earning position within two years. 

Cath Pearson, head of the PI- RTA department, said the firm’s growing reputation and a focus on building strong relationships was paying dividends. She said: “We have grown and are still growing. We bring in new people and almost immediately we need more. It’s a great position to be in and it means we’re getting the pick of some excellent, highly experienced candidates. 

Phillip Gilmore, Vincents managing partner, said: “Under Cath’s leadership this department is going from strength-to-strength. Where there are results, so follows investment and we are happy to continue to support the team’s growth. She is developing some excellent junior executives and attracting some great senior heads. We’re hoping the next round of recruitment will continue in that vein and will be looking to appoint new fee earners to the team within the next few months.”

Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll