header-logo header-logo

Void dismissals

18 October 2007 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Can compensation be granted for a dismissal which never lawfully happened in the first place? Nicholas Dobson

In Monty Python’s dead parrot sketch, the customer had some difficulty in persuading the owner that the purchased Norwegian Blue parrot was an ex-parrot. A similar situation had arisen in respect of a void dismissal in the decision of the Privy Council on 23 July 2007 in McLaughlin v Governor of the Cayman Islands [2007] UKPC 50, [2007] All ER (D) 360(Jul).
The claimant, Dr McLaughlin, a well-qualified scientist in the Cayman Islands Government Service, was purportedly dismissed on 31 December 1998. It was common ground that the dismissal or purported dismissal was in breach of natural justice and the relevant statutory regulation and was therefore unlawful.

RESIDUAL LIFE

The claimant had applied unsuccessfully for judicial review—among other things for a declaration that the dismissal and the decision to do so were void and also for reinstatement. While the Court of Appeal of the Cayman Islands found that the decision to dismiss and the dismissal were void— surprisingly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Manchester firm strengthens Court of Protection expertise with partner hire

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Agricultural law team expands with senior director appointments

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

NEWS
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll