header-logo header-logo

07 June 2012 / Hle Blog
Issue: 7517 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Waging war

HLE blogger Sophie Earnshaw bemoans the abolition of the current minimum wage for trainee solicitors

"On 17 May 2012 the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) announced their decision to abolish the current minimum wage for trainee solicitors. From 1 August 2014, law firms will be able to pay trainee solicitors the national minimum hourly rate of £6.08. These changes to remuneration will cause additional barriers to access a career in law and will have a negative impact on the legal profession with a less diverse and equal workforce. It will essentially result in a damaging step back in an area that has traditionally been a popular career choice for the middle class. Despite growing opportunities and encouragement for people of all backgrounds to enter law, to a certain extent it continues to be an area of work for those from privilege largely due to the prestige, expense and deep seated networks that remain embedded in the profession.

Deciding to pursue a career in law should not be under-estimated. It is a significant investment of money and time, particularly for those who self-fund and study part-time. Not only is there the expense of studying a law degree or conversion, the fees for the legal practice course or the Bar professional training course are high. On completing studies, the average student will be leaving with a mountain of debt. Acquiring a training contract is no simple feat and some enter into low paid, and even unpaid, positions as paralegals, legal support and interns to get their foot in the door. To survive on this salary when the cost of living is continually rising, is barely achievable in the short-term let alone sustainable long-term, unless they are lucky enough to have financial backing from family to support them through their career.

The SRA states that during the decision-making process they had given ‘full consideration to the potential diversity issues highlighted by the consultation and equality impact assessment, but concluded that setting a minimum salary was not the best way to address these’. This is highly questionable. By removing the set minimum salary for trainees, they will be preventing people from lower socio-economic backgrounds pursuing a career in law…”

To continue reading go to: www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk

Issue: 7517 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll