header-logo header-logo

13 August 2019 / Alec Samuels
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

War of words

Is parliamentary approval required before the government takes us into war, asks Alec Samuels

  • What should be the nature and extent of the powers of government?

Is parliamentary approval required before the government takes us into war? Is there a convention to this effect? Or is there a law? The Society of Conservative Lawyers has considered the matter and issued a report with recommendations.

Rule of war

Traditionally the constitutional and legal position has been that going to war is a matter for the royal prerogative, exercised by the sovereign on the advice of the prime minister of the government of the day. Government carries the responsibility and is thus accountable. Parliament should scrutinise the conduct of the government and call it to account.

This traditional rule has mostly applied in modern history. In 1939 Chamberlain took us into war, though he soon lost the confidence of Parliament and was replaced by Churchill who formed a coalition. In 1956 Eden took us into Suez, there was massive parliamentary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll