header-logo header-logo

15 December 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

Ward Hadaway has expanded its private client team with the appointment of solicitor Louise Miller, who joins the firm as a partner. Bringing almost 20 years’ experience advising individuals, families and business owners, she works across estate planning, wills, powers of attorney, trusts and probate, as well as complex succession planning for entrepreneurs. Her arrival follows a period of growth for the firm, including its merger with Teesside’s Endeavour Partnership and the opening of a Birmingham office.

Alison Hall, head of private client, described Louise as ‘a highly respected adviser with extensive experience across the full spectrum of estate planning and wealth protection’. She said Louise’s work with entrepreneurs ‘adds an important dimension to our team’ and supports the firm’s ambition to build a market-leading service for individuals and families across the UK.

Louise, who joins from Weightmans where she was a partner in the private wealth team, said the opportunity to join Ward Hadaway was ‘something I couldn’t turn down’. She added that she had ‘admired the team’s work for many years’ and was excited to contribute to the next phase of growth, particularly around succession planning for entrepreneurs and business owners.

Based in Newcastle, Louise joins partners Alison Hall and Andrew Facer in leading the wills, trusts and estates team, which works closely with financial planners and tax advisers to provide integrated support for clients nationwide. Managing partner Steven Petrie said her appointment ‘reflects the momentum we are building across the firm’ and strengthens the firm’s private client capability as it continues to invest in people and core services.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll