header-logo header-logo

13 April 2007
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Warning over Sarah's Law pilots

Parents and teachers will be able to access information about paedophiles in their area as part of a pilot scheme to be announced by John Reid, the Home Secretary.

The trial of Sarah’s Law—a version of Megan’s Law in the US—will allow single mothers to ask police about the risk posed by new partners, while headteachers will be told about dangerous offenders in their communities. Parents will not be given names and addresses, but will be told how many offenders are in their area. Sara Payne, the mother of the murdered schoolgirl Sarah, says she welcomes the news. But child experts warn it could backfire.

Barnardo’s chief executive Martin Narey says he is shocked by news of the trials, claiming his  organisation and the NSPCC had been assured the pilots would not take place. He says: “This is very, very bad news. Our only concern is children and this will put children’s lives in danger.”

Sex offenders, he says, may be driven underground. “Sex offenders are very difficult to supervise…if we have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll