header-logo header-logo

20 July 2011
Issue: 7475 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Warning from watchdog

Legal ombudsman advises against unregulated services

Clients are left powerless when unregulated will-writing and claims management companies make mistakes, and the situation is likely to get worse, the legal ombudsman has warned.

In his first annual report to Parliament since the organisation launched in October 2010, chief legal ombudsman Adam Sampson highlighted current gaps in regulation.

One service that “crops up a lot” is unregulated will-writing firms, he said. “Because of this customers are left with little means of redress when things go wrong.

“We’ve seen similar confusion about claims management companies, with lots of customers believing they’re getting a legal service even though most of the work is carried out by a non-authorised person. Again, we can’t help.”

The difficulties with the current regulatory regime are likely to increase, given the increasing “commoditisation” of legal services and the continuing influence of technology, the report states. The impending introduction of alternative business structures under the Legal Services Act will also “present new challenges at the edges of regulation”.

Sampson said the market shake-up would see legal services provided by large corporations and bundled up with financial services and other products.

“In some cases, the issue might go instead to another ombudsman. In some, Trading Standards” he said.

“Sometimes, there may be no-one in a position to help. There is a huge risk of overlap and confusion here which it is important that the regulators and policy-makers begin to focus on.

“Some firms offer ‘expert’ online legal advice which is often bundled with financial or insurance services, and many of these are backed by large corporations. Naturally, consumers expect the same standard of care as from their local lawyer, but in some cases it’s woefully lacking.”

Conveyancing accounted for one in five of the 4,000 complaints accepted for investigation by the ombudsman, as did family law work. More than 13% of the complaints arose from will-writing and probate. Litigation gave rise to roughly ten per cent of complaints, and so did personal injury work.

The Legal Services Board consumer panel called for will-writing to become a reserved activity, in a report published last week. It conducted a mystery-shopping exercise in which more than a fifth of 64 wills were found to be of inadequate quality.

Issue: 7475 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll